Comparison

TraceBug vs Marker.io

Marker.io collects client feedback. TraceBug captures the technical evidence that gets bugs fixed.

Try TraceBug in 30 seconds:

$ npm install tracebug-sdk
import TraceBug from "tracebug-sdk";
TraceBug.init({ projectId: "my-app" });

Why developers choose TraceBug over Marker.io

Deep technical capture — DOM replay, console errors, network requests, and a repro timeline, not just an annotated screenshot
AI-agent ready — the report is machine-readable over a local MCP server; a failing Playwright test verifies the fix
Free and open source — Marker.io is a paid per-seat product
No account and no widget snippet approval process — install the extension and capture on any site
Local-first — evidence stays on your machine until you choose where it goes
Exports everywhere Marker.io sends feedback (GitHub, Jira, Linear) — plus PDF, HAR, zip, and AI-ready formats

When Marker.io might be a better fit

Marker.io is built for CLIENT feedback — non-technical reporters annotating a live site into your PM tool with zero setup on their side
Marker.io has two-way sync with project tools (status updates flow back to the reporter)
Marker.io has team routing, forms, and SLA-style workflows agencies rely on

Ready to try TraceBug?

Free, open source, and takes under 2 minutes to set up.