Comparison
TraceBug vs Sentry
Sentry tells you an error happened. TraceBug gives your AI everything it needs to fix it.
Try TraceBug in 30 seconds:
$ npm install tracebug-sdk
import TraceBug from "tracebug-sdk";
TraceBug.init({ projectId: "my-app" });
TraceBug.init({ projectId: "my-app" });
Why developers choose TraceBug over Sentry
✓Full context, not a stack trace — DOM replay, repro timeline, console, and network around the failure, in one file
✓AI-agent ready — the report is machine-readable over a local MCP server; Claude Code or Cursor investigates it directly
✓Generated failing Playwright test per report — your agent (or CI) verifies the fix
✓Zero backend, zero DSN, zero event quota — works in 2 minutes with no per-event pricing
✓Privacy-first — nothing is uploaded anywhere; Sentry ships every error to their cloud
✓QA-friendly — testers capture with the extension, no code access needed
When Sentry might be a better fit
•Sentry monitors production passively at scale — TraceBug captures bugs deliberately, one at a time
•Sentry has server-side error tracking (Python, Ruby, Java, etc.), alerting, and PagerDuty/Slack integrations
•Sentry has performance monitoring, tracing, and release-health dashboards
Ready to try TraceBug?
Free, open source, and takes under 2 minutes to set up.